<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Baron Briefs &#187; propsmart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.realtybaron.com/category/propsmart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.realtybaron.com</link>
	<description>Real estate news and commentary from RealtyBaron.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:57:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Real Estate Search: How does RealSearchâ„¢ stack up . . . ?</title>
		<link>http://blog.realtybaron.com/2007/01/09/real-estate-search-how-does-realsearch%e2%84%a2-stack-up/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.realtybaron.com/2007/01/09/real-estate-search-how-does-realsearch%e2%84%a2-stack-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>realtybaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[atlanta real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buying a home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicago real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denver real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[las vegas real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miami real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phoenix real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propsmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realestate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realtybaron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san diego real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seattle real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trulia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington dc real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.realtybaron.com/2007/01/09/real-estate-search-how-does-realsearch%e2%84%a2-stack-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;pretty good if you ask me. This morning, I searched for homes with asking prices between $250,000 and $500,000 in 13 metro areas and compared the size of RealtyBaron&#8217;s RealSearchâ„¢ results with two real estate search leaders, Trulia and Propsmart. The results surprised me: Atlanta 1,462 1,496 2,693 Boston 242 498 1,240 Chicago 2,420 10,023 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;pretty good if you ask me.  This morning, I searched for homes with asking prices between $250,000 and $500,000 in 13 metro areas and compared the size of RealtyBaron&#8217;s <a title="real estate search" href="http://www.realtybaron.com/search/">RealSearch</a>â„¢ results with two real estate search leaders, <a href="http://www.trulia.com">Trulia</a> and <a href="http://www.propsmart.com">Propsmart</a>.  The results surprised me:</p>
<table width="400" style="text-align: center">
<tr>
<th></th>
<th><img alt="trulia" id="image151" src="http://blog.realtybaron.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/trulia.jpg" /></th>
<th><img alt="propsmart" id="image152" src="http://blog.realtybaron.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/propsmart.jpg" /></th>
<th><img alt="realtybaron search" id="image153" src="http://blog.realtybaron.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/realtybaron-search.jpg" /></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Atlanta</td>
<td>1,462</td>
<td>1,496</td>
<td style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #ffff99">2,693</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Boston</td>
<td>242</td>
<td>498</td>
<td style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #ffff99">1,240</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chicago</td>
<td>2,420</td>
<td style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #ffff99">10,023</td>
<td>9,199</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dallas</td>
<td>744</td>
<td>332</td>
<td style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #ffff99">1,950</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Denver</td>
<td>411</td>
<td style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #ffff99">1,358</td>
<td>1,186</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vegas</td>
<td style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #ffff99">5,050</td>
<td>3,264</td>
<td>3,336</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>L.A.</td>
<td>369</td>
<td>2,686</td>
<td style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #ffff99">4,023</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Miami</td>
<td>1,950</td>
<td>8,770</td>
<td style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #ffff99">10,375</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Phoenix</td>
<td>2,128</td>
<td style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #ffff99">6,802</td>
<td>4,063</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Seattle</td>
<td>298</td>
<td style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #ffff99">3,470</td>
<td>751</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>S.D.</td>
<td>1,038</td>
<td>3,238</td>
<td style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #ffff99">5,519</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>S.F.</td>
<td>75</td>
<td>468</td>
<td style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #ffff99">1,186</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>D.C.</td>
<td>603</td>
<td>720</td>
<td style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #ffff99">2,374</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" style="text-align: left; font-style: italic">**NOTE: 15% added to Trulia numbers to account for no FSBOs in results.</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Was this a scientific comparison?  No, because it doesn&#8217;t consider the <em>quality</em> of the listing data.  For example, Trulia&#8217;s or Propsmart&#8217;s search algorithms may exclude listings from their index if the listing is missing data points A, B, and/or C.  As a result, the <em>total</em> number of their results would be lower.  Regardless, it was nice to visualize how RealtyBaron&#8217;s <a title="real estate search" href="http://www.realtybaron.com/search/">RealSearch</a>â„¢ sizes up against the incumbents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.realtybaron.com/2007/01/09/real-estate-search-how-does-realsearch%e2%84%a2-stack-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NEW FEATURE: Buyer Rebate Auctions!</title>
		<link>http://blog.realtybaron.com/2006/07/25/new-feature-buyer-rebate-auctions/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.realtybaron.com/2006/07/25/new-feature-buyer-rebate-auctions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>realtybaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[buying a home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propsmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realestate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realtor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realtor.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rebates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trulia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.realtybaron.com/2006/07/25/new-feature-buyer-rebate-auctions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since launching RealtyBaron.com, our auction platform has only been introducing homeowners to RealtorsÂ®. Today, we start helping the other side of the real estate transaction with Buyer Rebate Auctions. Basically, anyone who has taken the home search into their own hands using vertical search tools such as Realtor.com, Trulia, or Propsmart can use this new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since launching RealtyBaron.com, our auction platform has only been introducing homeowners to RealtorsÂ®.  Today, we start helping the other side of the real estate transaction with <a title="realtor rebate" href="http://realtybaron.com/PurchaseAuction.htm">Buyer Rebate Auctions</a>.</p>
<p>Basically, anyone who has taken the home search into their own hands using vertical search tools such as <a href="http://www.realtor.com">Realtor.com</a>, <a href="http://www.trulia.com">Trulia</a>, or <a href="http://www.propsmart.com">Propsmart</a> can use this new feature to connect with a RealtorÂ® who will represent them in the transaction.  RealtorÂ® bids are based on what sales commission (or flat fee) they&#8217;d accept as compensation.  The rebate is the difference between the co-broke fee listed in the MLS and the Realtor&#8217;s final bid.  For example, a co-broke fee of 3% minus a final bid of 1% = 2% rebate for buyer.</p>
<p>Like RealtyBaron&#8217;s current Listing Auctions, bidding on Buyer Rebate Auctions will be controlled by the gatekeeper algorithm, <a href="http://www.realtybaron.com/agentrank">AgentRank</a>â„¢.  As the name implies, AgentRank(TM) ranks agents and prevents underperforming agents from bidding.  By specifying a minimum <a href="http://www.realtybaron.com/agentrank">AgentRank</a>â„¢, buyers can ensure they meet a Realtor who has a proven track record.</p>
<p>For RealtorsÂ®, this feature is an easy way to connect with clients who have already absorbed the most costly part of representing buyers&#8211;the prolonged home search.</p>
<p>UPDATE:  Inman News <a href="http://www.inman.com/inmanstories.aspx?ID=54812">writes about our new Buyer Rebate Auctions</a>.  Thanks, Glenn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.realtybaron.com/2006/07/25/new-feature-buyer-rebate-auctions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
